In re the Claim of Metz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Metz

49 A.D.2d 779, 372 N.Y.S.2d 233, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10799

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 11, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 779 (In re the Claim of Metz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Metz, 49 A.D.2d 779, 372 N.Y.S.2d 233, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10799 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 16, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner. The board held that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits effective June 23, 1974 because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The board found the credible evidence established that the claimant terminated her employment for personal and noncompelling reasons. There is substantial evidence in this record to support that finding and the determination should not be disturbed (Matter of Rubinstein [CatherwoodJ 33 AD2d 950). Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Main, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 16, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner. The board held that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits effective June 23, 1974 because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The board found the credible evidence established that the claimant terminated her employment for personal and noncompelling reasons. There is substantial evidence in this record to support that finding and the determination should not be disturbed (Matter of Rubinstein [CatherwoodJ 33 AD2d 950). Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Main, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 779, 372 N.Y.S.2d 233, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-metz-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack