In re the Claim of Mesagna

59 A.D.3d 801, 873 N.Y.S.2d 762
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 11, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 59 A.D.3d 801 (In re the Claim of Mesagna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Mesagna, 59 A.D.3d 801, 873 N.Y.S.2d 762 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 9, 2007, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant, a superintendent at an apartment complex, was discharged in February 2007 after he was arrested in connection with an incident wherein he threatened a tenant with a baseball bat. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ultimately ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he had lost his employment as a result of misconduct. This appeal by claimant ensued.

We affirm. “An employee’s contentious or threatening behavior in the workplace may constitute disqualifying misconduct” (Matter of Irizarri [Commissioner of Labor], 45 AD3d 1149, 1149 [2007] [citation omitted]). In the case at bar, claimant’s assertion that he never threatened the tenant created a credibility issue for resolution by the Board, and the testimony from the employer’s property manager provided substantial evidence to support the Board’s determination that claimant was fired due to misconduct (see id.).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and Steiny JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Ponce
75 A.D.3d 1041 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
In re the Claim of Santiago
69 A.D.3d 1090 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 A.D.3d 801, 873 N.Y.S.2d 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-mesagna-nyappdiv-2009.