In re the Claim of Mesagna
This text of 59 A.D.3d 801 (In re the Claim of Mesagna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 9, 2007, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant, a superintendent at an apartment complex, was discharged in February 2007 after he was arrested in connection with an incident wherein he threatened a tenant with a baseball bat. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ultimately ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he had lost his employment as a result of misconduct. This appeal by claimant ensued.
We affirm. “An employee’s contentious or threatening behavior in the workplace may constitute disqualifying misconduct” (Matter of Irizarri [Commissioner of Labor], 45 AD3d 1149, 1149 [2007] [citation omitted]). In the case at bar, claimant’s assertion that he never threatened the tenant created a credibility issue for resolution by the Board, and the testimony from the employer’s property manager provided substantial evidence to support the Board’s determination that claimant was fired due to misconduct (see id.).
Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and Steiny JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 A.D.3d 801, 873 N.Y.S.2d 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-mesagna-nyappdiv-2009.