In re the Claim of McQueen

176 A.D.2d 413, 574 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12393
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 19, 1991·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment [414]*414Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 8, 1991, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant, who was employed part-time as a receiving clerk, left his employment of 2 Vz years when his work schedule was reduced because there was not enough work available at the time. Claimant admitted that, at the time he was hired, he knew that his hours would fluctuate. In addition, claimant could have stayed employed and supplemented his earnings with partial unemployment insurance benefits. Consequently, the decision to disqualify claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause is supported by substantial evidence and must be upheld (see, Matter of White [Levine], 52 AD2d 1003; see also, Matter of Consentino [Ross] 71 AD2d 1042).

Weiss, J. P., Mikoll, Yesawich Jr., Levine and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of McQueen, 176 A.D.2d 413, 574 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12393 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

176 A.D.2d 413 (In re the Claim of McQueen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Kabuya
242 A.D.2d 811 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
In re the Claim of Cudnik
235 A.D.2d 888 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)