In re the Claim of McNiell

447 N.E.2d 82, 58 N.Y.2d 959, 460 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 2902
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 23, 1983·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), orders affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (88 AD2d 1050).

[962]*962Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of McNiell, 447 N.E.2d 82, 58 N.Y.2d 959, 460 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 2902 (N.Y. 1983).

447 N.E.2d 82 (In re the Claim of McNiell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Claims of Summers
21 A.D.3d 669 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)