In re the Claim of McBurney

46 A.D.3d 1308, 848 N.Y.S.2d 451
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 27, 2007·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 1, 2006, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision, among other things, charging claimant with a recoverable overpayment of unemployment insurance benefits.

The sole issue presented on this appeal by claimant is whether the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board properly charged her with a recoverable overpayment of unemployment insurance benefits. We find that it did. The record reveals that, in applying for unemployment insurance benefits, claimant represented that she had been separated from her employment as a waitress due to lack of work, when in reality she had been terminated for drinking alcohol on the job. Given the foregoing, substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision (see Labor Law § 597 [4]; Matter of Kanela [Commissioner of Labor], 21 AD3d 632, 633 [2005]), notwithstanding claimant’s contention that her misrepresentation was unintentional (see Matter of Piccirilli [Roberts], 92 AD2d 686, 686-687 [1983]. Accordingly, we affirm.

Spain, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of McBurney, 46 A.D.3d 1308, 848 N.Y.S.2d 451 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

46 A.D.3d 1308 (In re the Claim of McBurney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Arrigo (Commissioner of Labor)
2022 NY Slip Op 07119 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
In re the Claim of Diaz
57 A.D.3d 1150 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
In re the Claim of Spiegler
51 A.D.3d 1349 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)