In re the Claim of Martinez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Martinez

183 A.D.2d 1093, 586 N.Y.S.2d 530, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7182

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 21, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 183 A.D.2d 1093 (In re the Claim of Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Martinez, 183 A.D.2d 1093, 586 N.Y.S.2d 530, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7182 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 8, 1991, which ruled that claimant’s appeal was untimely.

Claimant failed to timely file his appeal from the decision of the Administrative Law Judge which ruled that he was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits (see, Labor Law § 621 [1]). The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board therefore properly dismissed the appeal as untimely (see, Matter of Kulawiak [Ross], 82 AD2d 1014; Matter of Gavin [Levine], 52 AD2d 1006) and the merits of claimant’s case are not properly before this court.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 8, 1991, which ruled that claimant’s appeal was untimely.

Claimant failed to timely file his appeal from the decision of the Administrative Law Judge which ruled that he was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits (see, Labor Law § 621 [1]). The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board therefore properly dismissed the appeal as untimely (see, Matter of Kulawiak [Ross], 82 AD2d 1014; Matter of Gavin [Levine], 52 AD2d 1006) and the merits of claimant’s case are not properly before this court.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 A.D.2d 1093, 586 N.Y.S.2d 530, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-martinez-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack