In re the Claim of Markham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Markham

209 A.D.2d 756, 617 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10837

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 3, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 209 A.D.2d 756 (In re the Claim of Markham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Markham, 209 A.D.2d 756, 617 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10837 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

-—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 9, 1993, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Although claimant informed his employer that he had to go away and was therefore unable to work for approximately three weeks, he was away only a few days. Claimant never contacted his employer upon his return and he was therefore not put back on the schedule. Claimant’s actions in absenting himself from work constituted an abandonment of his job. Under the circumstances presented, the Board’s conclusion that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause is supported by substantial evidence and must be upheld.

Cardona, P. J., White, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

-—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 9, 1993, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Although claimant informed his employer that he had to go away and was therefore unable to work for approximately three weeks, he was away only a few days. Claimant never contacted his employer upon his return and he was therefore not put back on the schedule. Claimant’s actions in absenting himself from work constituted an abandonment of his job. Under the circumstances presented, the Board’s conclusion that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause is supported by substantial evidence and must be upheld.

Cardona, P. J., White, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 A.D.2d 756, 617 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-markham-nyappdiv-1994.