In re the Claim of Marcus

235 A.D.2d 886, 652 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 529
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 23, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 5, 1995, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

[887] Claimant was employed as a clerical worker for a heating oil delivery company when he became embroiled in a dispute with a co-worker and threatened him with a knife. As a result, claimant was discharged from his employment. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found claimant to be disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he lost his employment due to misconduct. We agree. Substantial evidence in the record supports the finding that claimant participated in a fight during working hours and such participation was sufficient to constitute disqualifying misconduct (see, Matter of Kilgore [Triboro Coach Corp.—Sweeney], 227 AD2d 710; Matter of Redjepi [Hudacs], 210 AD2d 727, 728).

Cardona, P. J., Yesawich Jr., Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Marcus, 235 A.D.2d 886, 652 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 529 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

235 A.D.2d 886 (In re the Claim of Marcus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Santana
263 A.D.2d 564 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)