In re the Claim of Manelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Manelli

49 A.D.2d 984, 374 N.Y.S.2d 380, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11302

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 49 A.D.2d 984 (In re the Claim of Manelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Manelli, 49 A.D.2d 984, 374 N.Y.S.2d 380, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11302 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 16, 1974, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying the claimant from receiving benefits effective July 13, 1974 because she lost her employment through misconduct. The claimant herein had a basic disagreement with her supervisor over t^e manner in which she performed her work. She reacted to her supervisor’s instructions in an excitable way. Issues of credibility and whether the claimant engaged in misconduct in connection with her employment are questions of fact within the province of the board. In our view there was substantial evidence to support its determination and it should not be disturbed (Matter of James [Levine], 34 NY2d 491). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Koreman, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 16, 1974, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying the claimant from receiving benefits effective July 13, 1974 because she lost her employment through misconduct. The claimant herein had a basic disagreement with her supervisor over t^e manner in which she performed her work. She reacted to her supervisor’s instructions in an excitable way. Issues of credibility and whether the claimant engaged in misconduct in connection with her employment are questions of fact within the province of the board. In our view there was substantial evidence to support its determination and it should not be disturbed (Matter of James [Levine], 34 NY2d 491). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Koreman, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 984, 374 N.Y.S.2d 380, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-manelli-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack