In re the Claim of Lynch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Lynch

32 A.D.2d 704, 299 N.Y.S.2d 926, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3973

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 16, 1969

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 32 A.D.2d 704 (In re the Claim of Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Lynch, 32 A.D.2d 704, 299 N.Y.S.2d 926, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3973 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which disqualified claimant from benefits on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. In his signed summary of interview, claimant stated that when he found he was eligible for retirement, after more than 20 years’ service with the employer, he applied for, and was granted early retirement; and that he thereby became entitled to a $5,000 paid-up insurance policy which he would lose if he were discharged or if he quit. It appeared from the same statement that he did not intend to withdraw from the labor market and, in fact, he did not. Upon this record, the board’s finding was warranted; and the board was justified, also, in characterizing as afterthoughts various other statements made by claimant as additional reasons for his leaving and in finding them not credible. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum Per Curiam.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which disqualified claimant from benefits on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. In his signed summary of interview, claimant stated that when he found he was eligible for retirement, after more than 20 years’ service with the employer, he applied for, and was granted early retirement; and that he thereby became entitled to a $5,000 paid-up insurance policy which he would lose if he were discharged or if he quit. It appeared from the same statement that he did not intend to withdraw from the labor market and, in fact, he did not. Upon this record, the board’s finding was warranted; and the board was justified, also, in characterizing as afterthoughts various other statements made by claimant as additional reasons for his leaving and in finding them not credible. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum Per Curiam.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 704, 299 N.Y.S.2d 926, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-lynch-nyappdiv-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack