In re the Claim of Lowery

201 A.D.2d 814, 607 N.Y.S.2d 199, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1165
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 10, 1994·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 16, 1992, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she refused suitable employment without good cause.-

Upon review of the record, we find that there was substantial evidence to support the Board’s determination that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because she re[815] fused, without good cause, employment for which she was suited by training and experience. Claimant does not dispute that she was qualified to perform the proffered position as a data entry operator. She claims, however, that she properly refused the job because it was too far away and the offered salary was too low. The Board acted within its authority in not finding these excuses persuasive. We note that, with respect to claimant’s salary argument, she failed to allege or prove at the hearing that the wages offered for the job were less than those customarily paid in the locality for similar positions.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Casey, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Lowery, 201 A.D.2d 814, 607 N.Y.S.2d 199, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1165 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

201 A.D.2d 814 (In re the Claim of Lowery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Faillace
308 A.D.2d 654 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re the Claim of Garth
238 A.D.2d 662 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)