In re the Claim of Lord

241 A.D.2d 685, 663 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7345
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 10, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 4, 1996, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant’s benefit rate should be reduced.

The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that Labor Law § 600 (7) (b) required a reduction in claimant’s benefit rate reflecting his receipt of payments from an employer-funded pension fund. Claimant was also charged with a recoverable overpayment. We affirm. Substantial evidence supports the finding that claimant’s pension fund was 100% funded by the employer, thereby triggering the statutory reduction in benefit payments (see, Matter of Chriscaden [Sweeney], 232 AD2d 803; Matter of Skinder [Sweeney], 226 AD2d 796).

[686] Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Lord, 241 A.D.2d 685, 663 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7345 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

241 A.D.2d 685 (In re the Claim of Lord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Licciardello
255 A.D.2d 850 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)