In re the Claim of Lombard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Lombard

201 A.D.2d 807, 607 N.Y.S.2d 495, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1172

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 10, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 4, 1992, which ruled that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

Substantial evidence exists in the record to support the decision of the Board that claimant, a per diem substitute teacher, did not have a reasonable assurance of employment for the 1991-1992 school year. The June 12, 1991 letter from claimant’s employer made no promise of a job nor did it state that claimant was on any substitute list maintained either by the employer or the individual schools. Instead, claimant was given the burden of contacting the schools if he was interested in teaching. Under the circumstances, the Board’s decision ruling that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits must be upheld.

[808]*808Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 4, 1992, which ruled that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

Substantial evidence exists in the record to support the decision of the Board that claimant, a per diem substitute teacher, did not have a reasonable assurance of employment for the 1991-1992 school year. The June 12, 1991 letter from claimant’s employer made no promise of a job nor did it state that claimant was on any substitute list maintained either by the employer or the individual schools. Instead, claimant was given the burden of contacting the schools if he was interested in teaching. Under the circumstances, the Board’s decision ruling that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits must be upheld.

[808]*808Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

In re the Claim of Lombard, 201 A.D.2d 807, 607 N.Y.S.2d 495, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1172 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

201 A.D.2d 807 (In re the Claim of Lombard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related