In re the Claim of Lombard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Lombard

201 A.D.2d 807, 607 N.Y.S.2d 495, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1172

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 10, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 201 A.D.2d 807 (In re the Claim of Lombard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Lombard, 201 A.D.2d 807, 607 N.Y.S.2d 495, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1172 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 4, 1992, which ruled that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

Substantial evidence exists in the record to support the decision of the Board that claimant, a per diem substitute teacher, did not have a reasonable assurance of employment for the 1991-1992 school year. The June 12, 1991 letter from claimant’s employer made no promise of a job nor did it state that claimant was on any substitute list maintained either by the employer or the individual schools. Instead, claimant was given the burden of contacting the schools if he was interested in teaching. Under the circumstances, the Board’s decision ruling that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits must be upheld.

[808]*808Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 4, 1992, which ruled that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

Substantial evidence exists in the record to support the decision of the Board that claimant, a per diem substitute teacher, did not have a reasonable assurance of employment for the 1991-1992 school year. The June 12, 1991 letter from claimant’s employer made no promise of a job nor did it state that claimant was on any substitute list maintained either by the employer or the individual schools. Instead, claimant was given the burden of contacting the schools if he was interested in teaching. Under the circumstances, the Board’s decision ruling that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits must be upheld.

[808]*808Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 807, 607 N.Y.S.2d 495, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-lombard-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack