In re the Claim of Loh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Loh

302 A.D.2d 786, 754 N.Y.S.2d 916, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1491

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 20, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 302 A.D.2d 786 (In re the Claim of Loh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Loh, 302 A.D.2d 786, 754 N.Y.S.2d 916, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1491 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 26, 2002, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

After being laid off from his job in the information technology field, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed. At the time he applied for unemployment insurance benefits, claimant was the sole shareholder and president of an information technology business. Although claimant maintained that he [787]*787was using the business as a conduit to obtain full-time employment or consulting work as an independent contractor, the record establishes that claimant also intended to take a home office deduction on his tax returns. In addition, the corporation had a Web site, internet service and toll-free telephone number and business cards printed. Regardless of the minimal nature of the daily activities on behalf of the corporation and the lack of remuneration, the record provides substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision that claimant was not totally unemployed (see Matter of Schenker [Commissioner of Labor], 284 AD2d 765; Matter of Bezdezowski [Commissioner of Labor], 271 AD2d 794).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 26, 2002, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

After being laid off from his job in the information technology field, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed. At the time he applied for unemployment insurance benefits, claimant was the sole shareholder and president of an information technology business. Although claimant maintained that he [787]*787was using the business as a conduit to obtain full-time employment or consulting work as an independent contractor, the record establishes that claimant also intended to take a home office deduction on his tax returns. In addition, the corporation had a Web site, internet service and toll-free telephone number and business cards printed. Regardless of the minimal nature of the daily activities on behalf of the corporation and the lack of remuneration, the record provides substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision that claimant was not totally unemployed (see Matter of Schenker [Commissioner of Labor], 284 AD2d 765; Matter of Bezdezowski [Commissioner of Labor], 271 AD2d 794).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

302 A.D.2d 786, 754 N.Y.S.2d 916, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-loh-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack