In re the Claim of Linderman

207 A.D.2d 929, 616 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8832
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 15, 1994·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 5, 1990, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

The decision of the Board from which claimant now attempts to appeal was filed and mailed on October 5, 1990. Claimant did not file an appeal to this Court, however, until December 8, 1992. Under the circumstances, claimant’s appeal must be dismissed as untimely (see, Labor Law § 624). In any event, substantial evidence exists in the record to support the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Linderman, 207 A.D.2d 929, 616 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8832 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

207 A.D.2d 929 (In re the Claim of Linderman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Worden
252 A.D.2d 711 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
In re the Claim of Roper
251 A.D.2d 884 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)