In re the Claim of Linderman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Linderman

207 A.D.2d 929, 616 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8832

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 207 A.D.2d 929 (In re the Claim of Linderman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Linderman, 207 A.D.2d 929, 616 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8832 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 5, 1990, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

The decision of the Board from which claimant now attempts to appeal was filed and mailed on October 5, 1990. Claimant did not file an appeal to this Court, however, until December 8, 1992. Under the circumstances, claimant’s appeal must be dismissed as untimely (see, Labor Law § 624). In any event, substantial evidence exists in the record to support the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 5, 1990, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

The decision of the Board from which claimant now attempts to appeal was filed and mailed on October 5, 1990. Claimant did not file an appeal to this Court, however, until December 8, 1992. Under the circumstances, claimant’s appeal must be dismissed as untimely (see, Labor Law § 624). In any event, substantial evidence exists in the record to support the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 A.D.2d 929, 616 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-linderman-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack