In re the Claim of Limoli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Limoli

207 A.D.2d 933, 616 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8811

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 207 A.D.2d 933 (In re the Claim of Limoli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Limoli, 207 A.D.2d 933, 616 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8811 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 31, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

The Board found that the employer’s remark questioning claimant’s competence as a bookkeeper was isolated and done to protect the employer’s business from other possible costly errors. The Board also found that the employer was satisfied with claimant’s work and that there was continuing work available for claimant. Given these findings and the record before us, there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s conclusion that claimant voluntarily left her job without good cause for personal, noncompelling reasons.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Weiss, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 31, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

The Board found that the employer’s remark questioning claimant’s competence as a bookkeeper was isolated and done to protect the employer’s business from other possible costly errors. The Board also found that the employer was satisfied with claimant’s work and that there was continuing work available for claimant. Given these findings and the record before us, there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s conclusion that claimant voluntarily left her job without good cause for personal, noncompelling reasons.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Weiss, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 A.D.2d 933, 616 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-limoli-nyappdiv-1994.