In re the Claim of Libes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Libes

199 A.D.2d 801, 608 N.Y.S.2d 124, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12206

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 199 A.D.2d 801 (In re the Claim of Libes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Libes, 199 A.D.2d 801, 608 N.Y.S.2d 124, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12206 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insur[802]*802anee Appeal Board, filed July 14, 1992 and July 21, 1992, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

There is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s factual finding that claimant received vacation pay for the time periods at issue and that he was therefore ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits. Claimant’s remaining contentions have been considered, including his argument that he did not make willful false statements, and rejected for lack of merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decisions are affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insur[802]*802anee Appeal Board, filed July 14, 1992 and July 21, 1992, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

There is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s factual finding that claimant received vacation pay for the time periods at issue and that he was therefore ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits. Claimant’s remaining contentions have been considered, including his argument that he did not make willful false statements, and rejected for lack of merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decisions are affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 A.D.2d 801, 608 N.Y.S.2d 124, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-libes-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack