In re the Claim of Lewis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Lewis

212 A.D.2d 926, 622 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1596

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 16, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 212 A.D.2d 926 (In re the Claim of Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Lewis, 212 A.D.2d 926, 622 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1596 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 1, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemploy[927]*927ment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

We have reviewed the record and conclude that there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision that claimant left her position as the employer’s director of contracts for noncompelling reasons arising out of claimant’s disagreement with her supervisor over the management of a difficult subordinate. Contrary to claimant’s argument, we do not find that the employer’s reasonable suggestions as to how claimant handle the situation constituted good cause for her resignation. As it stands, the record supports the Board’s finding that claimant quit because she was not capable of handling the problem with the subordinate. Claimant’s remaining contentions have been examined and found unpersuasive.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Casey, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 1, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemploy[927]*927ment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

We have reviewed the record and conclude that there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision that claimant left her position as the employer’s director of contracts for noncompelling reasons arising out of claimant’s disagreement with her supervisor over the management of a difficult subordinate. Contrary to claimant’s argument, we do not find that the employer’s reasonable suggestions as to how claimant handle the situation constituted good cause for her resignation. As it stands, the record supports the Board’s finding that claimant quit because she was not capable of handling the problem with the subordinate. Claimant’s remaining contentions have been examined and found unpersuasive.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Casey, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 A.D.2d 926, 622 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-lewis-nyappdiv-1995.