In re the Claim of Levitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Levitt

27 A.D.2d 969, 279 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4343

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 27, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 969 (In re the Claim of Levitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Levitt, 27 A.D.2d 969, 279 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4343 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Herlihy, J.

Appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which affirmed the decisions of a Referee and the Industrial Commissioner denying benefits to the claimant and imposing a penalty for a willful misrepresentation. The testimony of the claimant established that she accepted employment at three days per week and subsequently left this employment for personal reasons. She initially reported that this employment was a “ tem[970]*970porary assignment ”, but there is no doubt that it was permanent employment and she knew it. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Herlihy, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herlihy, J.

Appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which affirmed the decisions of a Referee and the Industrial Commissioner denying benefits to the claimant and imposing a penalty for a willful misrepresentation. The testimony of the claimant established that she accepted employment at three days per week and subsequently left this employment for personal reasons. She initially reported that this employment was a “ tem[970]*970porary assignment ”, but there is no doubt that it was permanent employment and she knew it. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Herlihy, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 969, 279 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-levitt-nyappdiv-1967.