In re the Claim of Leofanti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Leofanti

23 A.D.2d 936, 260 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4093

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 24, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 23 A.D.2d 936 (In re the Claim of Leofanti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Leofanti, 23 A.D.2d 936, 260 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4093 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which found that claimant left his job voluntarily and without good cause. None of the various alleged abuses cited by claimant to justify his resignation are sufficient as a matter of law to sustain his contention (see Matter of Rambam [Catherwood], 22 A D 2d 736). There is only a factual issue presented which was determined against claimant and which is amply supported by the evidence (Matter of Sperling [Catherwood], 20 A D 2d 584, mot. for iv. to opp. den. 14 N Y 2d 481). Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which found that claimant left his job voluntarily and without good cause. None of the various alleged abuses cited by claimant to justify his resignation are sufficient as a matter of law to sustain his contention (see Matter of Rambam [Catherwood], 22 A D 2d 736). There is only a factual issue presented which was determined against claimant and which is amply supported by the evidence (Matter of Sperling [Catherwood], 20 A D 2d 584, mot. for iv. to opp. den. 14 N Y 2d 481). Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A.D.2d 936, 260 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-leofanti-nyappdiv-1965.