In re the Claim of Lederman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Lederman

201 A.D.2d 819, 607 N.Y.S.2d 196, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1148

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 10, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.D.2d 819 (In re the Claim of Lederman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Lederman, 201 A.D.2d 819, 607 N.Y.S.2d 196, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 10, [820]*8201992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant quit her job because she was afraid she would be accused of stealing money from her employer. She admitted, however, that she was never accused of taking the money and that she was never told that she was going to be held responsible or that she would be fired. Given these facts and the record before us, there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s conclusion that claimant left her employment voluntarily and without good cause. Claimant’s remaining arguments have been considered and rejected as unpersuasive.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 10, [820]*8201992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant quit her job because she was afraid she would be accused of stealing money from her employer. She admitted, however, that she was never accused of taking the money and that she was never told that she was going to be held responsible or that she would be fired. Given these facts and the record before us, there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s conclusion that claimant left her employment voluntarily and without good cause. Claimant’s remaining arguments have been considered and rejected as unpersuasive.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 819, 607 N.Y.S.2d 196, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-lederman-nyappdiv-1994.