In re the Claim of Lamoretti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Lamoretti

219 A.D.2d 748, 631 N.Y.S.2d 546

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 7, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 219 A.D.2d 748 (In re the Claim of Lamoretti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Lamoretti, 219 A.D.2d 748, 631 N.Y.S.2d 546 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 23, 1994, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

On its own motion, the Board reopened claimant’s case to determine if there had been compliance with the procedural safeguards set forth in the consent judgment in Municipal Labor Comm. v Sitkin (79 Civ 5899, 1983 WL 44294). Upon finding no procedural violations, the Board adhered to its prior decision finding that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. In view of claimant’s failure to raise any procedural arguments on appeal, we decline to disturb the Board’s decision.

Crew III, J. P., White, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 23, 1994, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

On its own motion, the Board reopened claimant’s case to determine if there had been compliance with the procedural safeguards set forth in the consent judgment in Municipal Labor Comm. v Sitkin (79 Civ 5899, 1983 WL 44294). Upon finding no procedural violations, the Board adhered to its prior decision finding that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. In view of claimant’s failure to raise any procedural arguments on appeal, we decline to disturb the Board’s decision.

Crew III, J. P., White, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 A.D.2d 748, 631 N.Y.S.2d 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-lamoretti-nyappdiv-1995.