In re the Claim of Laboy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Laboy

161 A.D.2d 910, 558 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5770

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 17, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 161 A.D.2d 910 (In re the Claim of Laboy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Laboy, 161 A.D.2d 910, 558 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5770 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 21, 1989.

[911]*911The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s finding that the employer failed to make a timely request for a hearing has a rational basis and must be sustained. The employer’s admitted receipt of a document entitled "Notice of Determination that Claimant is Eligible” was sufficient to put her on notice that claimant had been ruled eligible for benefits. There is nothing in the body of the notice to suggest that any determination had been made other than that referred to in the title.

Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 21, 1989.

[911]*911The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s finding that the employer failed to make a timely request for a hearing has a rational basis and must be sustained. The employer’s admitted receipt of a document entitled "Notice of Determination that Claimant is Eligible” was sufficient to put her on notice that claimant had been ruled eligible for benefits. There is nothing in the body of the notice to suggest that any determination had been made other than that referred to in the title.

Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 A.D.2d 910, 558 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-laboy-nyappdiv-1990.