In re the Claim of La Greca

30 A.D.2d 597, 290 N.Y.S.2d 26, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3986
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 20, 1968·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Gabrielli, J.

Appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 25, 1967, disqualifying claimant from unemployment insurance benefits. The board has disqualified claimant from receiving benefits on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The claimant contends that she left the job because she understood she was discharged, although she admits she was not told she was “fired” or “discharged”, it appearing only that her foreman had expressed a lack of confidence in her and dissatisfaction with some work she had previously done. Upon the record, the board could find that the employer’s remarks were limited to criticism which did not justify the claimant’s action in leaving her job (Matter of Chawkin [Catherwood], 18 A D 2d 750) and the board’s findings that she had no compelling reasons to leave the job and that she had voluntarily left without good cause, are based on substantial evidence. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Gabrielli, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of La Greca, 30 A.D.2d 597, 290 N.Y.S.2d 26, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3986 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

30 A.D.2d 597 (In re the Claim of La Greca) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim Jarvis
109 A.D.2d 377 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Thomas v. District of Columbia Department of Labor
409 A.2d 164 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1979)
In re the Claim of Hogan
50 A.D.2d 650 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)