In re the Claim of La Clair

281 A.D.2d 677, 721 N.Y.S.2d 163, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2012
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 1, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeals (1) from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 13, 2000, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant’s request for a hearing was untimely, and (2) from a decision of said Board, filed October 25, 2000, which, upon reconsideration, ruled, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant challenges the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s decision that she voluntarily resigned her position as a part-time tutor without good cause. Claimant left because she believed the employer would be unable to assign her a minimum of 20 hours of work per week, despite the employer’s request that she delay , her resignation while it attempted to [678] adjust her work schedule

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of La Clair, 281 A.D.2d 677, 721 N.Y.S.2d 163, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2012 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

281 A.D.2d 677 (In re the Claim of La Clair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Shifreen
23 A.D.3d 823 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)