In re the Claim of Kunkel

95 A.D.3d 1584, 945 N.Y.S.2d 773

This text of 95 A.D.3d 1584 (In re the Claim of Kunkel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Kunkel, 95 A.D.3d 1584, 945 N.Y.S.2d 773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinions

Lahtinen, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 25, 2011, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant lost his employment as a press operator due to disqualifying misconduct. The record establishes that on April 2, 2010, claimant removed two boxes of used metal plates from the employer’s premises in violation of the employer’s policy for disposal of such property and sold them for $99. Furthermore, claimant’s supervisor testified that on March 12, 2010, claimant removed scrap paper from the employer’s premises and was verbally warned that nothing should be removed from the workplace without prior authorization. Inasmuch as a violation of a known policy of the employer that is detrimental to the employer’s interest has been held to constitute disqualifying misconduct (see Matter of Kaissar [Commissioner of Labor], 3 AD3d 829, 830 [2004]), we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision. Claimant’s contention that he was unaware of the employer’s policy presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see Matter of Schaffer [Byrne Dairy, Inc. — Commissioner of Labor], 54 AD3d 1111, 1112 [2008]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Kaissar
3 A.D.3d 829 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re the Claim of Clum
51 A.D.3d 1171 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
In re the Claim of Dunham
68 A.D.3d 1328 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
In re Spierto
78 A.D.3d 1365 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
In re the Claim of Schaffer
54 A.D.3d 1111 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 A.D.3d 1584, 945 N.Y.S.2d 773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-kunkel-nyappdiv-2012.