In re the Claim of Kuehl

52 A.D.2d 978, 383 N.Y.S.2d 109, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12858

This text of 52 A.D.2d 978 (In re the Claim of Kuehl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Kuehl, 52 A.D.2d 978, 383 N.Y.S.2d 109, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12858 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinions

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 14, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner reducing claimant’s benefit rate to zero pursuant to section 600 of the Labor Law. Claimant, vice-president and general manager of International Talc Company, was entitled to receive pension benefits under a plan funded entirely by his employer. Upon the sale of the corporation in May of 1974, claimant continued his employment with the St. Lawrence Liquidating Company which was formed at that time to dispose of the remaining Talc assets not made a part of that sale. Claimant’s services were terminated on April 18, 1975 for lack of work and shortly thereafter St. Lawrence was dissolved. In May of 1975 claimant began receiving monthly pension benefits, which by application of section 600 of the Labor Law the board has used to reduce the amount of his unemployment insurance benefits. Substantial evidence supports the finding of the board that claimant is receiving a pension totally funded by the employer. Claimant’s unemployment insurance benefit rate was therefore properly reduced from $95 to zero pursuant to section 600 of the Labor Law. We find no merit in claimant’s contention that since the employer which is providing the pension was legally dissolved, that employer is not charged for claimant’s unemployment insurance benefits, and, therefore, claimant’s benefit rate should not be reduced. Decision affirmed, without costs. Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur; Greenblott, J. P., and Kane, J., dissent and vote to reverse in the following memorandum by Kane, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Swaybill
35 A.D.2d 752 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 A.D.2d 978, 383 N.Y.S.2d 109, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-kuehl-nyappdiv-1976.