In re the Claim of Koenig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Koenig

51 A.D.2d 615, 377 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10945

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 51 A.D.2d 615 (In re the Claim of Koenig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Koenig, 51 A.D.2d 615, 377 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10945 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 19, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner, disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause, and on the further ground that she was not available for employment. The evidence in this record supports the determination that claimant’s refusal to return to [616]*616her place of employment at the termination of her maternity leave was without just cause. Such a determination is a factual one, and if supported by substantial evidence must be sustained (Matter of Wilensky [Catherwood] 33 AD2d 830; Labor Law, § 623). Furthermore, her limited efforts to obtain employment rendered her unavailable for employment (Matter of Bennett [Catherwood], 33 AD2d 946). Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Koreman, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 19, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner, disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause, and on the further ground that she was not available for employment. The evidence in this record supports the determination that claimant’s refusal to return to [616]*616her place of employment at the termination of her maternity leave was without just cause. Such a determination is a factual one, and if supported by substantial evidence must be sustained (Matter of Wilensky [Catherwood] 33 AD2d 830; Labor Law, § 623). Furthermore, her limited efforts to obtain employment rendered her unavailable for employment (Matter of Bennett [Catherwood], 33 AD2d 946). Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Koreman, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 615, 377 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-koenig-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack