In re the Claim of Knight

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Knight

234 A.D.2d 885, 651 N.Y.S.2d 951

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 26, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 234 A.D.2d 885 (In re the Claim of Knight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Knight, 234 A.D.2d 885, 651 N.Y.S.2d 951 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 19, 1995, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant admittedly received and read a notice of determination finding her ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits and liable for a recoverable overpayment of $1,670.25. The notification, dated May 18, 1995 and mailed May 19, 1995, specifically informed claimant that she had 30 days from its date to request a hearing to contest it (see, Labor Law § 620 [1] [a]). Accordingly, the Board’s decision finding that claimant’s request for a hearing, dated July 21, 1995, was untimely is supported by substantial evidence and must be affirmed (see, Matter of Hart [Hudacs], 199 AD2d 667).

Mikoll, J. P., White, Casey, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 19, 1995, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant admittedly received and read a notice of determination finding her ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits and liable for a recoverable overpayment of $1,670.25. The notification, dated May 18, 1995 and mailed May 19, 1995, specifically informed claimant that she had 30 days from its date to request a hearing to contest it (see, Labor Law § 620 [1] [a]). Accordingly, the Board’s decision finding that claimant’s request for a hearing, dated July 21, 1995, was untimely is supported by substantial evidence and must be affirmed (see, Matter of Hart [Hudacs], 199 AD2d 667).

Mikoll, J. P., White, Casey, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D.2d 885, 651 N.Y.S.2d 951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-knight-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack