In re the Claim of Klapper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Klapper

29 A.D.2d 592, 285 N.Y.S.2d 448, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2767

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1967

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 A.D.2d 592 (In re the Claim of Klapper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Klapper, 29 A.D.2d 592, 285 N.Y.S.2d 448, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2767 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal from a decision of the board which determined claimant disqualified for benefits as of September 12, 1966 and that she made a willful false statement on October 10, 1966. While the record suggests that there were job offers made to claimant in August, the board determined that on September 12, 1966 she refused a job offer and upon that finding it follows that a willful false statement was made in the month of October. The factual issues, including credibility, are within the province of the board and there is substantial evidence to sustain its determination. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in a memorandum by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal from a decision of the board which determined claimant disqualified for benefits as of September 12, 1966 and that she made a willful false statement on October 10, 1966. While the record suggests that there were job offers made to claimant in August, the board determined that on September 12, 1966 she refused a job offer and upon that finding it follows that a willful false statement was made in the month of October. The factual issues, including credibility, are within the province of the board and there is substantial evidence to sustain its determination. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in a memorandum by the court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 592, 285 N.Y.S.2d 448, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-klapper-nyappdiv-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack