In re the Claim of King

278 A.D. 1036, 106 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5614
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 19, 1951
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 278 A.D. 1036 (In re the Claim of King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of King, 278 A.D. 1036, 106 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5614 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which modified and as modified affirmed a referee’s decision overruling an initial determination of the appellant which had imposed a forfeiture of benefits against claimant for twenty-four effective days because he willfully made a false statement to obtain a benefit. The false statement was made in January, 1950, to obtain a benefit to which it was found claimant was then ineligible because of insufficient earnings in his base year of 1948. The forfeiture aforesaid was then imposed and applied against him later when in the next benefit year and in June, 1950, he again filed for benefits. This in our view the statute expressly permits. Decision reversed, on the law, and the initial determination of the commissioner reinstated, without costs. Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Schurmann
16 A.D.2d 311 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D. 1036, 106 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-king-nyappdiv-1951.