In re the Claim of Kenny

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Kenny

202 A.D.2d 931, 609 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3091

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 202 A.D.2d 931 (In re the Claim of Kenny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Kenny, 202 A.D.2d 931, 609 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3091 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 29, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Evidence in the record supports the Board’s finding that claimant, who had been employed as a kennel attendant, was guilty of misconduct when he violated the employer’s rule concerning bringing animals to the employer’s place of business and, when directed to comply with that rule, failed to do so and acted in an insubordinate manner. We have considered claimant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 29, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Evidence in the record supports the Board’s finding that claimant, who had been employed as a kennel attendant, was guilty of misconduct when he violated the employer’s rule concerning bringing animals to the employer’s place of business and, when directed to comply with that rule, failed to do so and acted in an insubordinate manner. We have considered claimant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 A.D.2d 931, 609 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-kenny-nyappdiv-1994.