In re the Claim of Kelley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Kelley

206 A.D.2d 722, 614 N.Y.S.2d 940, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7520

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 21, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 206 A.D.2d 722 (In re the Claim of Kelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Kelley, 206 A.D.2d 722, 614 N.Y.S.2d 940, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7520 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 28, 1993, which ruled that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

We find that there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s determination that claimant did not voluntarily leave his employment as a paralegal without good cause. The credible evidence established that claimant left his job because of his employer’s verbal abuse and deprecating behavior, which exceeded the bounds of propriety. Significantly, the Board was free to disbelieve the employer’s witnesses and credit those of claimant.

Cardona, P. J., White, Weiss, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 28, 1993, which ruled that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

We find that there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s determination that claimant did not voluntarily leave his employment as a paralegal without good cause. The credible evidence established that claimant left his job because of his employer’s verbal abuse and deprecating behavior, which exceeded the bounds of propriety. Significantly, the Board was free to disbelieve the employer’s witnesses and credit those of claimant.

Cardona, P. J., White, Weiss, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 A.D.2d 722, 614 N.Y.S.2d 940, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-kelley-nyappdiv-1994.