In re the Claim of Keane
161 N.E.2d 17, 6 N.Y.2d 910, 190 N.Y.S.2d 714, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1197
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs to claimants-respondents; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Claim of Keane, 161 N.E.2d 17, 6 N.Y.2d 910, 190 N.Y.S.2d 714, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1197 (N.Y. 1959).
161 N.E.2d 17 (In re the Claim of Keane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Steinfeld Ex Rel. Estate of General Vision Services v. Richard A. Eisner & Co. (In Re General Vision Services, Inc.)
423 B.R. 790 (S.D. New York, 2010)