In re the Claim of Keane
161 N.E.2d 17, 6 N.Y.2d 910, 190 N.Y.S.2d 714, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1197
This text of 161 N.E.2d 17 (In re the Claim of Keane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re the Claim of Keane, 161 N.E.2d 17, 6 N.Y.2d 910, 190 N.Y.S.2d 714, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1197 (N.Y. 1959).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs to claimants-respondents; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Steinfeld Ex Rel. Estate of General Vision Services v. Richard A. Eisner & Co. (In Re General Vision Services, Inc.)
423 B.R. 790 (S.D. New York, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
161 N.E.2d 17, 6 N.Y.2d 910, 190 N.Y.S.2d 714, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-keane-ny-1959.