In re the Claim of Karutis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Karutis

216 A.D.2d 624, 627 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5873

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 216 A.D.2d 624 (In re the Claim of Karutis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Karutis, 216 A.D.2d 624, 627 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5873 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 18, 1993, which dismissed claimant’s appeal from the decision of an Administrative Law Judge as untimely.

There is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s finding that claimant did not appeal from the decision of the Administrative Law Judge within the statutory 20-day time period. Claimant has not even offered an excuse for the delay. Accordingly, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 18, 1993, which dismissed claimant’s appeal from the decision of an Administrative Law Judge as untimely.

There is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s finding that claimant did not appeal from the decision of the Administrative Law Judge within the statutory 20-day time period. Claimant has not even offered an excuse for the delay. Accordingly, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 A.D.2d 624, 627 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-karutis-nyappdiv-1995.