In re the Claim of Kaplan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Kaplan

51 A.D.2d 1077, 381 N.Y.S.2d 150, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11916

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 11, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 1077 (In re the Claim of Kaplan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Kaplan, 51 A.D.2d 1077, 381 N.Y.S.2d 150, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 15, 1975, which reversed the decision of a referee and sustained the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective December 14, 1974 on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant, a part-time telephone operator, was employed for three years at an office in Long Island City, located about one hour’s travel time from her home in Brooklyn. She was notified that she was to be assigned permanently to the Jackson Heights office in Queens. Claimant, however, rejected this assignment and resigned. The board found that this trip would have required less than one hour’s travel time from claimant’s home. The board’s finding that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause is supported by substantial evidence and we must affirm. Decision affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Mahoney, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 15, 1975, which reversed the decision of a referee and sustained the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective December 14, 1974 on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant, a part-time telephone operator, was employed for three years at an office in Long Island City, located about one hour’s travel time from her home in Brooklyn. She was notified that she was to be assigned permanently to the Jackson Heights office in Queens. Claimant, however, rejected this assignment and resigned. The board found that this trip would have required less than one hour’s travel time from claimant’s home. The board’s finding that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause is supported by substantial evidence and we must affirm. Decision affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Mahoney, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 1077, 381 N.Y.S.2d 150, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-kaplan-nyappdiv-1976.