In re the Claim of Kalm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Kalm

278 A.D. 1035, 106 N.Y.S.2d 914, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5612

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 19, 1951

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 278 A.D. 1035 (In re the Claim of Kalm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Kalm, 278 A.D. 1035, 106 N.Y.S.2d 914, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5612 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the Industrial Commissioner from that portion of a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which modified the decision of an unemployment insurance referee, and reversed the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant for benefits upon the ground that without good cause he refused offers of employment for which he was reasonably fitted by training and experience. The evidence presented is sketchy, inconsistent and fails to establish facts with clarity. Upon the record before us we cannot say as a matter of law that claimant refused employment under circumstances which justified his disqualification for benefits. We decide nothing more. Decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board affirmed, without costs. Present — Poster, P. J., Heffeman, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the Industrial Commissioner from that portion of a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which modified the decision of an unemployment insurance referee, and reversed the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant for benefits upon the ground that without good cause he refused offers of employment for which he was reasonably fitted by training and experience. The evidence presented is sketchy, inconsistent and fails to establish facts with clarity. Upon the record before us we cannot say as a matter of law that claimant refused employment under circumstances which justified his disqualification for benefits. We decide nothing more. Decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board affirmed, without costs. Present — Poster, P. J., Heffeman, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 A.D. 1035, 106 N.Y.S.2d 914, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-kalm-nyappdiv-1951.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack