In re the Claim of Joyce

250 A.D.2d 901, 672 N.Y.S.2d 521, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5356
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 7, 1998·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 6, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant was employed as a postal worker until July 12, 1996, when he was ordered to leave the premises after an outburst whereby he screamed racist remarks and threatened his co-workers. The employer’s psychiatrist thereafter found claimant “not fit for duty” and advised him to seek outside psychiatric treatment. The employer subsequently informed claimant that until he obtained this treatment, he would be unable to return to work. Nevertheless, claimant advised the employer that he was unwilling to seek outside psychiatric treatment.

In our view, substantial evidence suppprts the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s decision ruling that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause. It is well [902] settled that, “[w]hen a claimant fails to take a step that is reasonably required as a prerequisite to continued employment, the claimant will be deemed to have left his employment without good cause” (Matter of Bonilla [Sweeney], 233 AD2d 735, 735-736). Here, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Joyce, 250 A.D.2d 901, 672 N.Y.S.2d 521, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5356 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

250 A.D.2d 901 (In re the Claim of Joyce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Bonilla (Commissioner of Labor)
2021 NY Slip Op 00347 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
In re the Claim of Carrasco
271 A.D.2d 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re the Claim of Murphy
264 A.D.2d 877 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)