In re the Claim of Jones

202 A.D.2d 889, 609 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2805
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 24, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 16, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

As a result of certain conduct displayed by claimant, she was asked by her employer to submit to a series of appointments with a psychiatrist to determine her fitness for continued duty. When claimant refused, and having been warned of [890] the consequences of such action, she was terminated from her employment as a staff physician. Under the circumstances, we find substantial evidence in the record to support the determination of the Board that claimant’s failure to carry out a reasonable request of her employer constituted misconduct, thereby disqualifying her from receiving unemployment insurance benefits. Any remaining contentions raised by claimant have been considered and found lacking in merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Weiss and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Jones, 202 A.D.2d 889, 609 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

202 A.D.2d 889 (In re the Claim of Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Lloyd
242 A.D.2d 817 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)