In re the Claim of Jeffery

279 A.D.2d 685, 717 N.Y.S.2d 797, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 69
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 4, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 279 A.D.2d 685 (In re the Claim of Jeffery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Jeffery, 279 A.D.2d 685, 717 N.Y.S.2d 797, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 69 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

Appeal [686]*686from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 16, 1999, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was not totally unemployed during the periods in question and made willful false statements to obtain benefits (see, Matter of Petvai [Commissioner of Labor], 275 AD2d 821). On claimant’s applications for unemployment insurance benefits, she failed to indicate that she was president and 50% shareholder of a corporation engaged in the advertising business. Claimant was also a signatory on the corporate checking account and admitted to handling the operations of the business. Notwithstanding claimant’s minimal activities in the corporation, she nevertheless earned compensation from the business. Under these circumstances, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s finding that claimant was not totally unemployed (see, id.; Matter of Baumbach [Commissioner of Labor], 250 AD2d 918). Furthermore, inasmuch as claimant failed to disclose her status as a corporate officer when certifying for benefits, substantial evidence supports the Board’s further finding that claimant made willful false statements to obtain benefits (see, Matter of Santo [Commissioner of Labor], 274 AD2d 816).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Nicotra
6 A.D.3d 909 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.D.2d 685, 717 N.Y.S.2d 797, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-jeffery-nyappdiv-2001.