In re the Claim of Jarvis

228 A.D.2d 846, 644 N.Y.2d 94, 644 N.Y.S.2d 94, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6697
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 13, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

As a result of claimant’s failure to disclose a prior felony sexual abuse conviction on his employment application, claimant was discharged from his position as a school custodian. The Board denied his application for unemployment insurance benefits, finding that he was discharged for misconduct. Inasmuch as claimant does not dispute the fact that he failed to disclose this felony conviction when asked on his employment application, the Board’s finding of misconduct is supported by substantial evidence and must be upheld (see, Matter of Yuhas [Sweeney], 220 AD2d 977).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Jarvis, 228 A.D.2d 846, 644 N.Y.2d 94, 644 N.Y.S.2d 94, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6697 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

228 A.D.2d 846 (In re the Claim of Jarvis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Class
261 A.D.2d 772 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
In re the Claim of Silva
255 A.D.2d 681 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)