In re the Claim of Imran

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Imran

212 A.D.2d 927, 623 N.Y.S.2d 176, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1592

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 16, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 212 A.D.2d 927 (In re the Claim of Imran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Imran, 212 A.D.2d 927, 623 N.Y.S.2d 176, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1592 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 27, 1993, which [928]*928ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

The Board found that claimant, a driver for a hotel, abandoned his employment. In reaching the conclusion that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause, the Board noted that claimant overstayed his leave period by more than two months and admitted that he made no efforts to contact his employer during that time. Under the circumstances and given the record before us, we find substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision denying claimant’s request for benefits. Claimant’s contentions to the contrary raise questions of credibility which were for the Board to resolve.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 27, 1993, which [928]*928ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

The Board found that claimant, a driver for a hotel, abandoned his employment. In reaching the conclusion that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause, the Board noted that claimant overstayed his leave period by more than two months and admitted that he made no efforts to contact his employer during that time. Under the circumstances and given the record before us, we find substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision denying claimant’s request for benefits. Claimant’s contentions to the contrary raise questions of credibility which were for the Board to resolve.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 A.D.2d 927, 623 N.Y.S.2d 176, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-imran-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack