In re the Claim of Ilibassi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Ilibassi

27 A.D.2d 673, 276 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5080

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 5, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 673 (In re the Claim of Ilibassi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Ilibassi, 27 A.D.2d 673, 276 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5080 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board (1) holding claimant ineligible for benefits on the ground that he was not totally unemployed, (2) charging him with an overpayment which was ruled recoverable, and (3) imposing a forfeiture of 116 effective days in reduction of future benefit lights upon finding that he willfully made false statements to obtain benefits. The board’s findings were predicated largely upon proof of certain sales contracts prepared by claimant himself, showing sales on commission during the period for which he certified total unemployment. Certainly the board was entitled to credit this evidence and to deny credence, as it expressly did, to claimant’s statement that he predated all the contracts. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board (1) holding claimant ineligible for benefits on the ground that he was not totally unemployed, (2) charging him with an overpayment which was ruled recoverable, and (3) imposing a forfeiture of 116 effective days in reduction of future benefit lights upon finding that he willfully made false statements to obtain benefits. The board’s findings were predicated largely upon proof of certain sales contracts prepared by claimant himself, showing sales on commission during the period for which he certified total unemployment. Certainly the board was entitled to credit this evidence and to deny credence, as it expressly did, to claimant’s statement that he predated all the contracts. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 673, 276 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5080, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-ilibassi-nyappdiv-1967.