In re the Claim of Hughes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Hughes

23 A.D.2d 515, 255 N.Y.S.2d 330, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5058

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 12, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 23 A.D.2d 515 (In re the Claim of Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Hughes, 23 A.D.2d 515, 255 N.Y.S.2d 330, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5058 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Herlihy, J.

This appeal is from the board's determination that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause by provoking her discharge. (See Labor Law, § 593.) We cannot say that the record does not justify the board’s resolution that the credible evidence did not sustain claimant’s contention as to the effect upon her health by the new working conditions and that her apparent inability to get along with her superior did not constitute good cause for her voluntary separation from her employment. Such factual findings are within the exclusive province of the board. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herlihy, J.

This appeal is from the board's determination that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause by provoking her discharge. (See Labor Law, § 593.) We cannot say that the record does not justify the board’s resolution that the credible evidence did not sustain claimant’s contention as to the effect upon her health by the new working conditions and that her apparent inability to get along with her superior did not constitute good cause for her voluntary separation from her employment. Such factual findings are within the exclusive province of the board. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A.D.2d 515, 255 N.Y.S.2d 330, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-hughes-nyappdiv-1965.