In re the Claim of Horton
This text of 463 N.E.2d 1217 (In re the Claim of Horton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum by Justice John T. Casey at the Appellate Division (97 AD2d 610, 612) and decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reinstated.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
463 N.E.2d 1217, 61 N.Y.2d 988, 475 N.Y.S.2d 365, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-horton-ny-1984.