In re the Claim of Hirschberg
This text of 273 A.D. 936 (In re the Claim of Hirschberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Unemployment Appeal Board has determined that respondent did not refuse employment without good cause and that she was qualified to receive the benefits asked. The facts, particularly the employment later obtained, sustain the decision of the board. We may not substitute our judgment when there is proof to sustain the board’s determination. Decision of the board affirmed, without costs. Hill, P. J., Heifernan and Russell, JJ., concur; Brewster and Foster, JJ., dissent. (Matter of Heater [Corsi], 270 App. Div. 311.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
273 A.D. 936, 77 N.Y.S.2d 915, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-hirschberg-nyappdiv-1948.