In re the Claim of Hickey v. New York Telephone Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Hickey v. New York Telephone Co.

80 A.D.2d 702, 436 N.Y.S.2d 446, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10414

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 19, 1981

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 80 A.D.2d 702 (In re the Claim of Hickey v. New York Telephone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Hickey v. New York Telephone Co., 80 A.D.2d 702, 436 N.Y.S.2d 446, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10414 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals from decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed April 20, 1978 and November 5, 1979, which held that claimant had a permanent partial disability attributable to his conceded industrial accident of June 26, 1972 and that claimant did not voluntarily withdraw from the labor market. The board found: “the employer had ample opportunity to produce its evidence and testimony but failed to do so. The Panel further finds based on the evidence in the record that the claimant did not voluntarily withdraw from the labor market.” Substantial evidence in the record supports these determinations of the board. Decisions affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents filing briefs. Kane, J. P., Main, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed April 20, 1978 and November 5, 1979, which held that claimant had a permanent partial disability attributable to his conceded industrial accident of June 26, 1972 and that claimant did not voluntarily withdraw from the labor market. The board found: “the employer had ample opportunity to produce its evidence and testimony but failed to do so. The Panel further finds based on the evidence in the record that the claimant did not voluntarily withdraw from the labor market.” Substantial evidence in the record supports these determinations of the board. Decisions affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents filing briefs. Kane, J. P., Main, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 A.D.2d 702, 436 N.Y.S.2d 446, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-hickey-v-new-york-telephone-co-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack