In re the Claim of Herring
Opinion
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 15, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
The record establishes that claimant was late for work on various occasions and continued her tardy behavior after verbal and written warnings. Claimant’s actions clearly constitute misconduct and provide substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision.
Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Crew III, White and Mahoney, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
199 A.D.2d 795 (In re the Claim of Herring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.