In re the Claim of Hernandez
264 N.E.2d 357, 27 N.Y.2d 811, 315 N.Y.S.2d 866, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1047
This text of 264 N.E.2d 357 (In re the Claim of Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re the Claim of Hernandez, 264 N.E.2d 357, 27 N.Y.2d 811, 315 N.Y.S.2d 866, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1047 (N.Y. 1970).
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs (see Matter of Bates [Catherwood], 26 N Y 2d 1028; see, also, Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U. S.. 254, 270). No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
264 N.E.2d 357, 27 N.Y.2d 811, 315 N.Y.S.2d 866, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-hernandez-ny-1970.