In re the Claim of Herman

25 A.D.2d 473, 266 N.Y.S.2d 92, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5199
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 13, 1966·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Hamm, J.

Appeal by claimant from a decision of the Unemplojmient Insurance Appeal Board that the claimant was not available for employment and was therefore not eligible for benefits. The board found that the claimant, although admittedly wishing to work only for a temporary period, had consistently sought permanent work, that she failed to make an active and realistic search for work and that her job efforts were token in nature and did not show a genuine attachment to the labor market. “Whether a person is available for employment during a specific period is a question of fact to be determined by the referee and the Appeal Board.” (Matter of Dunn [Corsi], 1 A D 2d 722.) We may not say as a matter of law that the board could not find as it did upon this record (Labor Law, § 623). Decision affirmed, without costs.

Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Herman, 25 A.D.2d 473, 266 N.Y.S.2d 92, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5199 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

25 A.D.2d 473 (In re the Claim of Herman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Solomon
53 A.D.2d 931 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)